A produced subjectivity.

Abstract

The validity of concepts such as construction, production of subjectivity in fields like Anthropology or Sociology is not
automatically transferred to Psychoanalysis. This is true since its subjects change remarkably – a ll of which is reflected in a tension
between disciplines – and since each concept drags others which are necessary to point out. While Sociology conceives the subject as “every man”, a generalization, a statistics subject, Psychoanalysis has a view of a specific subject who can’t be understood as an effect of causes without being subjected to violence. If Freud analyzed a man shaped by his time and time changed, and if we now intend to analyze the man of our time: what is the name of some of these typica l men who are cooked up by their time, where are the records which refer to these prototypes? Is it true that a time, a culture, a historical circumstance have a unanimous definition so as to be considered clear and effective causes?