Narratives, construction and narrative rhythms
Keywords:
ficción, interpretación, relatoAbstract
Starting from some definitions of ―account‖ and from the essential condition of speech practice in human activities I point out some distinctive features in literary account and its fictional condition, the importance of enunciation and reception and of the non-verifiable contract from that recognition as well as the ambiguity and polisemy that multiply its symbolic value. I also tackle the relation between the creator, the literary piece of work and the reader, compared to the situation of analyst and analyzed emphasizing two important differences: in the first case the relation is in absence and in the second in presence; in the first case the literary object, the piece of work exists and its significants are constant whereas the object created in the analyst-analized relation is virtual. In the end I point out the fragmentation of the accounts in the van of progress, stressed in today‘s intense civilization which seems to threaten the capacity to elaborate of the contemporary man.
Downloads
References
BALANDIER, G. (1988).- El desorden. La teoría del caos y las ciencias sociales. Elogio de la fecundidad del movimiento. Barcelona, Gedisa, 1994
BARTHES, R.- (1966) Análisis estructural del relato, Buenos Aires, Tiempo contemporáneo, 1970
BENJAMIN, W. (1955).- ―Sobre algunos temas de Baudelaire‖. En: Ensayos escogidos. Buenos Aires, Ed. Sur, 1967
BOURDIEU, P. (1973).- El oficio de sociólogo, México, Madrid, Siglo XXI, 1975
DEWEY, J. (1934).- El arte como experiencia. México-Buenos Aires, F.C.E. 1949
LE GOFF. (1977).- Pensar la historia, Barcelona, Paidós, 1991
LYOTARD, J. F.- La condition postmoderne. Paris, Ed. de Minuit, 1979.
RICOEUR, P. Du texte à l‟action. Essais d‟herméneutique II, Paris, Du Seuil, 1986.
RISCO, A. Literatura y figuración. Madrid, Gredos 1982..
SCHULTE-SASSE, J.- «L‘évaluation en litterature», En : ANGENOT et al. Théorie littéraire, Paris, Puf, 1989.