Indagación e investigación clínica en psicoanálisis a través de los grupos de trabajo de la Asociación Psicoanal´`itica Internacional
Resumen
La investigación clínica es un tema crucial para los psicoanalistas, ya que el conocimiento psicoanalítico ha surgido principalmente del ámbito clínico.
Descargas
Referencias
Altmann de Litvan, M. (2021a). Changes and no change in the representation of self and others through images and metaphors.En M. A. Fitzpatrick-Hanly, M. Altmann de Litvan y R. Bernardi (ed.), Change through time in psychoanalysis: Transformations and interventions with the Three-Level Model (pp. 79-101). Routledge.
Altmann de Litvan, M. (2021b). Clinical research in working parties through metaphors. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis: Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 324-334). Routledge.
Altmann de Litvan, M., Bernardi, R. y Fitzpatrick-Hanly,M. A. (2021). Is the Three-Level Model a clinical research tool? En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.),Clinical research in psychoanalysis: Theoretical
basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 171-182). Routledge.
Arlow, J. A. (1979). Metaphor and the psychoanalytic situation. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 48(3),
-385.
Bernardi, R. (2014). El modelo de los tres niveles para observar las transformaciones del paciente.
-LM. En M. Altmann de Litvan, M. (ed.), Tiempo de cambio: Indagando las transformaciones en
psicoanálisis: El modelo de los tres niveles (pp. 3-34). Karnac.
Bernardi, R. (2014). The assessment of changes:Diagnostic aspects. En M. Altmann de Litvan, M.
(ed.), Time for change: Tracking transformations in psychoanalysis – The Three-Level Model.Karnac.
Bernardi, R. (2017). A common ground in clinical discussion groups: Intersubjective resonance
and implicit operational theories. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 98(5),1291-1309.
Bernardi, R. (2021a). A common ground in clinical discussion groups: Intersubjective resonance
and implicit operational theories. En M.A. Fitzpatrick-Hanly, M. Altmann de Litvan y R. Bernardi (ed.), Change through time in psychoanalysis: Transformations and interventions with the Three-Level Model (pp. 13-33). Routledge.
Bernardi, R. (2021b). Moving from clinical inquiry to clinical research. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.),
Clinical research in psychoanalysis: Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties
(pp. 65-83). Routledge.
Bernardi, R. (2021c). Working groups and the search for clinical evidence. En M. Altmann de Litvan
(ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis:Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 312-323). Routledge.
Bion, W. R. (1967). Notes on memory and desire. En R. Lang (ed.), Classics in psychoanalytic technique.Jason Aronson.
Blatt, S. J., Corveleyn, J. y Luyten, P. (2006). Minding the gap between positivism and hermeneutics
in psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54(2),571-610.
Britton, R. y Steiner, J. (1994). Interpretation: Selected fact or overvalued idea? The International
Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 1069-1078.
Calich, J. C. (2021). The working party on Comparative Clinical Methods (CCM) and the investigation in psychoanalysis. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.),Clinical research in psychoanalysis: Theoretical
basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 183-187). Routledge.
Canestri, J. (2006). Implicit understanding of clinical material beyond theory. En J. Canestri (ed.),
Psychoanalysis: From practice to theory. John Wiley.
Cassorla, R., Duarte Gavião, A. C. y Carneiro, C. A.(2021). Developing the capacity for clinical investigation: The working party ‘microscopy of the analytic session’. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis:Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 202-213). Routledge.
Chabalgoity, A. M., Souza Brito, C. de y Ponce de León,E. (2021). Clinical groups on the specificity of
psychoanalysis today: A new research method for clinical understanding. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis:Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 188-194). Routledge.
Faimberg, H. (2021). Faimberg’s method ‘listening to listening’. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis: Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 195-201). Routledge.
Fitzpatrick-Hanly, M. A. (2019). Panel report, IPA Congress 2019: Transformation in female bodily experiences and bodily metaphors. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 100(5),1031-1033.
Fitzpatrick-Hanly, M. A., Leuzinger-Bohleber, M.y León de Bernardi, B. de (2021). Bodily metaphors as anchor points in facilitating change. En M. A. Fitzpatrick-Hanly, M. Altmann de Litvan y R. Bernardi (ed.), Change through time in psychoanalysis: Transformations and interventions with the Three-level Model.Routledge.
Freud, S. (1958). Remembering, repeating and working-through (further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis II). En J. Strachey (ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (vol. 12). The Hogarth Press. (Trabajo original publicado en 1914).
Freud, S. (1979a). La interpretación de los sueños. En J. L. Etcheverry (trad.), Obras completas (vol. 4).
Amorrortu. (Trabajo original publicado en 1900 [1899]).
Freud, S. (1979b). La interpretación de los sueños.En J. L. Etcheverry (trad.), Obras completas (vol.5). Amorrortu. (Trabajo original publicado en 1900-1901).
Freud, S. (1980). Tótem y tabú. En J. L. Etcheverry (trad.), Obras completas (vol. 13, pp.1-64).Amorrortu. (Trabajo original publicado en 1913 [1912-1913]).
Gibbs, R. (2010). The wonderful, chaotic, creative,heroic, challenging world of researching and
applying metaphor: A celebration of the past and some peeks into the future. En G. Low, Z.Todd,
A. Deignan y L. Cameron (ed.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world. John
Benjamins.
Glover, W. y Reith, B. (2021). Working parties as clinical research. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.),
Clinical research in psychoanalysis: Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties
(pp. 151-160). Routledge.
Grünbaum, A. (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis. University of California Press.
Hinshelwood, R. D. (2013). Research on the couch: Single-case studies, subjectivity and
psychoanalytic knowledge. Routledge.
Hinshelwood, R. D. (2021). Researching subjectivity:Single-case studies and psychoanalytic
knowledge. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.),Clinical research in psychoanalysis: Theoretical
basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 33-53). Routledge.
Jiménez, J. P. (2009). Grasping psychoanalysts’ practice in its own merits. The International
Journal of Psychoanalysis, 90(2), 231-248.
Kächele, H., Schachter, J. y Thomä, H. (2009). From psychoanalytic narrative to empirical single case
research: Implications for psychoanalytic practice.Routledge.
Katz, S. M. (2013). Metaphoric processes. En S.M. Katz (ed.), Metaphor and fields: Common ground,
common language, and the future of psychoanalysis. Routledge.
Lakoff, G. y Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by.The University of Chicago Press.
León de Bernardi, B. de (1993). Presentation, IPA Congress Amsterdam 1993: El sustrato compartido
de la interpretación. Imágenes,afectos y palabras en la experiencia analítica.Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis, 81, 121-140.
León de Bernardi, B. de (2013). Field theory as a metaphor and metaphors in the analytic field and
process. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 33, 247-266.
León de Bernardi, B. de (2021). Metaphors for the patient’s self as a multiple bridge for clinical
research. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis: Theoretical basis and
experiences through working parties (pp. 134-147). Routledge.
León de Bernardi, B. de y Altmann de Litvan, M. (2014). The Three-Level Model in psychoanalytic
training. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.),Time for change: Tracking transformations in psychoanalysis – the Three-Level Model. Karnac.
Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (2021a). Changes in dreams in the psychoanalysis of a traumatized, chronically depressed patient in the frame of the LAC depression study applying the 3-LM. En M. A. Fitzpatrick-Hanly, M. Altmann de Litvan y R. Bernardi (ed.), Change through time in psychoanalysis: Transformations and interventions with the Three-Level Model (pp.102-118). Routledge.
Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (2021b). What is ‘clinical research’? Historical, epistemological, and
methodological remarks on the relevance of clinical research in times of theoretical and scientific pluralism. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis:Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 89-107). Routledge.
Leuzinger‐Bohleber, M. y Fischmann, T. (2006). What is conceptual research in psychoanalysis? The
International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87(5),1355-1386.
Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Kallenbach, L. y Schoett, M.J. (2016). Pluralistic approaches to the study
of process and outcome in psychoanalysis. The LAC depression study: A case in point.Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 30(1), 4-22.
Liberman, D. (1971). Lingüística, interacción comunicativa y proceso psicoanalítico. Galerna/Nueva Visión.
Lima da Rocha Barros, E. (2021). Panel: How are metaphors identified and elaborated by the different
working parties? En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis:Theoretical basis
and experiences through working parties (pp. 220-235). Routledge.
Michels, R. (1994). Validation in the clinical process. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75,
-1140.
Modell, A. H. (1997). Reflections on metaphor and affects. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 25, 219-233.
Modell, A. H. (2005). Emotional memory, metaphor,and meaning. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 25(4),
-568.
Nieto, M., Bernardi, R., Fernandez, A., Ginés, M. A.y Muller, L. (1982). El futuro del psicoanálisis en
Latinoamérica. Presentation at the XIV Congreso Psicoanalítico de América Latina.Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis, 50, 1-18.
Pérez Suquilvide, L. (2021) The analyst’s perspective:Commonalities and differences of working
parties on a clinical material. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis:
Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 292-295). Routledge.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery.Hutchinson.
Quinodoz, J. M. (1994). Clinical facts or psychoanalytic clinical facts. The International Journal of
Psychoanalysis, 75, 963-976.
Quiroga de Pereira, A., Salesio, B. y Leibovich de Duarte, A. (2021). Metaphor transformations in the
-LM: A Systematic clinical exercise with Zoe’s case. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.),Clinical research in psychoanalysis: Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 254-274). Routledge.
Rizzuto, A. M. (2009). Metaphoric process and metaphor: The dialectics of shared analytic experience. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 29(1), 18-29.
Rizzuto, A. M. (2015). Freud and the spoken word:Speech as a key to the unconscious. Routledge.
Rizzuto, A. M. (2021). Clinical research: The role of metaphors in the analytic process. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis: Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 119-133). Routledge.
Sandler, J. y Sandler, A. M. (1994). Comments on the conceptualisation of clinical facts in psychoanalysis. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 995-1010.
Sandler, J., Sandler, A. M. y Davies, R. (ed.) (2000).Clinical and observational psychoanalytic
research: Roots of a controversy. Routledge.
Skelton, R. M. (ed.) (2006). The Edinburgh international encyclopaedia of psychoanalysis. Edinburgh
University Press.
Slipp, S. (2000). Introduction to neuroscience and psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 28(2), 191-201.
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures. CambridgeUniversity Press.
Souza Brito, C. de y Chabalgoity, A. M. (2021). A clinical illustration on the working party on the specificity of psychoanalytic treatment today: Latin American group. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis:Theoretical basis and experiences through working parties (pp. 236-253). Routledge.
Stern, D., Bruschweiler-Stern, N., Harrison, A., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A., Nahum, J. y Tronick, E.
(1988). The process of therapeutic change involving implicit knowledge: Some implications of developmental observations for adult psychotherapy. Infant Mental Health Journal,19(3), 300-308.
Tuckett, D. (1994). The conceptualisation and communication of clinical facts in psychoanalysis. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75(5-6), 865-870.
Vermote, R. (2021). Clinical psychoanalytic research with the working party method: State of the
art. En M. Altmann de Litvan (ed.), Clinical research in psychoanalysis: Theoretical basis and
experiences through working parties (pp. 296-311). Routledge.
Wallerstein, R. (2011). Metaphor in psychoanalysis:Bane or blessing? Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 31,
-106.
Widlöcher, D. (1994). A case is not a fact. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75,1233-1244.
Wurmser, L. (1977). A defense of the use of metaphor in analytic theory formation. The sychoanalytic
Quarterly, 46(3), 466-498.
Wurmser, L. (2013). Metaphor and conflict. En S. M. Katz (ed.), Metaphor and fields: Common
ground, common language, and the future of psychoanalysis. Routledge.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
This work is licensed under a 