Thinking with Freud in the XXI century.
I and the other in analytical training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36496/n130.131a3Keywords:
psychoanalytic training, alterity, transmission, psychoanalytic institution, history of psychoanalysis, heredity, psychoanalyst, identity, postmodernityAbstract
The speed and the magnitude of changes in society, in the liquid modernity in which we live, demands a thorough revision of the theoretical referents used in the solid modernity of the mid- twentieth century. The inclusion in the training ofsubjects and authors that approach this problem is proposed.
Downloads
References
Baranger, W. & Baranger, M. (1969). Problemas del campo psicoanalítico. Buenos Aires: Kargieman.
Barran, J. P. (1994). Historia de la sensibilidad en el Uruguay. Montevideo: EBO
Bion, W. R. (1990). Conferencias Brasileras. Londres: Karnac Books.
Castoriadis, C. (1989). La institución imaginaria de la sociedad. Barcelona: Tusquets.
Horenstein, M. (2016). Psicoanálisis en lengua menor. Córdoba: Viento de fondo.
Leclaire, S. (2000). Escritos para el psicoanálisis I. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Mannoni, O. (1969). La otra escena; claves de lo imaginario. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Viderman, S. (1982). La construction de l’espace analytique. París: Gallimard.
This work is licensed under a 