The Dangers of Neutrality
Keywords:
neutralidadAbstract
Publicado en el Psychoanalytic Quarterly, Vol. 65, 1996, Nº 3, páginas 495-517.
El concepto de la neutralidad analítica es comentado respecto a su utilidad como guía técnica. La participación de los juicios personales y los afectos del analista en el trabajo clínico se discuten en relación a los diferentes conceptos de cómo se lleva a cabo el aprendizaje dentro del análisis. También se considera el problema de cómo realmente se protege al paciente de ser explotado por el analista. Un caso clínico se utiliza como base para la discusión. (...)
Downloads
References
BADER, MJ. (1995). Authenticity and the psychology of choice in the analyst. Psychoanal. Q, 64: 282-305.
DAMASIO, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error. New York: Grosset/Putnam. EDELMAN, G. (1993). Bright Air, Brilliant Fire. New York: Harper.
EHRENBERG, DB. (1992). The Intimate Edge. Extending the Reach of Psychoanalytic Interaction. New York: Norton.
FREUD, S. (1905). On psychoterapy. S.E., 7.
FRIEDMAN, L. (1985). Potentially shrouded: how the newer theories work. Psychoanal. Q., 54: 379-414.
GREENBERG, J. (1991). Countertransference and reality. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 1:52-73.
HOFFER, A. (1985). Toward a definition of psychoanalytic neutrality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 33:771-795.
HOFFMAN, IZ. (1996). The intimate and ironic authority of the psychoanalyst’s presence. Psychoanal. Q., 65: 102-136.
KRIS, AO. (1993). Support and psychic structural change. En Psychic Structure andPsychic Change. Essays in Honor of Robert S. Wallerstein, M.D. ed. M. J. Horowitz, O. F. Kernberg & E. M. Weinshel. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 95-116.
LIPTON, SD. (1977). The advantages of Freud’s technique as shown in his analysis of the Rat Man. Int. J. Psychoanal., 58: 255-273.
McLAUGHLIN, JM. (1981). Transference, psychic reality, and countertransference. Psychoanal. Q., 50: 639-664.
NATTERSON JM; FRIEDMAN RJ. (1995). A Primer of Clinical Intersubjectivity. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
PIZER, SA. (1992). The negotiation of paradox in the analytic process. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 2: 215-240.
POLAND, WS. (1984). On the analyst’s neutrality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 32: 283-299
RAPHLING, DL. (1995). Interpretation and expectation: the anxiety of influence. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 43: 95-111.
RENIK, O. (1993). Countertransference enactment and the psychoanalytic process. En Psychic Structure and Psychic Change. Essays in Honor of Robert S. Wallerstein, M.D. ed. M. J. Horowitz, O. F. Kernberg & E. M. Weinshel. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press, pp. 137-160.
_______ (1994). Publication of clinical facts. Int. J. Psychoanal., 75: 1245-1250.
_______ (1995). The ideal of the anonymous analyst and the problem of selfdisclosure. Psychoanl. Q., 64. 466-495.
SCHWABER, EA. (1992). Countertransference: the analyst’s retreat from the patient’s vantage point. Int. J. Psychoanal., 73: 349-361.
SHAPIRO, T. (1984). On neutrality. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 32: 269-282.
SINGER, E. (1977). The fiction of analytic anonymity. En The Human Dimension in Psychoanalytic Practice. Ed. K. A. Frank. New York: Grune & Stratton, pp. 191-192.
SPEZZANO, C. (1993). Affect in Psychoanalysis. A Clinical Synthesis. Hillsdale, NJ/London: Analytic Press.
STEPANSKY, PE, Editor (1988). The Memoirs of Margaret S. Mahler. New York: Free Press.
STOLOROW, RD. (1990). Converting psychoterapy to psychoanalysis: a critique of the underlying assumptions. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 10: 119-129.
WEISS, J. (1993). How Psychoterapy Works. Process and Technique. New York/London: Guilford.
This work is licensed under a 