Respuesta a Guillermo Bodner y a José Assandri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36496/Resumen
Es un privilegio y un placer dialogar con Guillermo Bodner y con José Assandri. Intentaré, desde mi punto de vista, señalar acuerdos y desacuerdos, y también reconocer aquellos problemas difíciles que necesitan continuar abiertos a una mayor indagación.
Descargas
Referencias
Azcona, M., Muller, F., Labaronnie, C., Zurita, L.J., Lardizábal, E. M. y Tolini, L. D. (2023).Agreements and differences between
psychoanalysts with regard to changes observed during a treatment: A quantitative exploration using the Three-Level Model (3-LM).
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis,104(4), 657-678.
Bernardi, R. (2015). What kind of discipline is psychoanalysis? The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 96, 731-754.
Bernardi, R. (2017). A common ground in clinical discussion groups: Intersubjective resonance and implicit operational theories. The
International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 98(5),1291-1309.
Bernardi, R. (2023). Psychoanalytic identity in vivo: Permanence and change. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 104, 834-842.
Bernardi, R. y Eidlin (2024). Clinical evidence, triangulation of perspectives and contextualization. Part 1: The beginning of Carla’s treatment. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 93(1), 33-76.
Bernardi, R. y León de Bernardi, B. de (2019). Commentary on Bruce Fink’s «On the value of the Lacanian approach to analytic practice». The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 100(2),333-340.
Bernardi, R. y Nieto, M. (1992). What makes the training analysis «good enough»? The International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 19,
-146.
Bernardi, R., Pérez Suquilvide, L. y Hanly, C. (2021). Assessing strengths and limitations of clinical evidence in a psychoanalytic clinical material.En M. A. Fitzpatrick Hanly, M. Altmann de Litvan y R. Bernardi (ed.), Change through time in psychoanalysis. Transformations and interpretations, the Three-Level Model (pp. 281- 305). Routledge
Dellsén, F. (2024). Inferring to the best explanation from uncertain evidence. https://philsci-archive.
pitt.edu/23492/1/Evidentially%20Robust%20IBE%20PSAaccepted.pdf
Rodríguez Quiroga, A., Aufenacker, S., Crawley, A.,Waldron, S., Borensztein, L., Botero, C., Juan,S. y Bongiardino, L. (2023). A multicentre
study: Comparison of 3-LM group output and therapeutic outcome measures. Adding to the trustworthiness of the 3-LM? Part 1. The
International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 104(1),69-95.
Stanford, K. (2009). Underdetermination of scientific theory. En E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University.
Wallerstein, R. (ed.) (1984). Changes in analysts and in their training. International Psychoanalytical Association.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
This work is licensed under a 