dialectics of transferential interpretation, analytic field and metaphor
Keywords:
psychoanalytic process, interpretation, transference, psychoanalytic field /, thought, metaphor, bond, dialectic, figurabilityAbstract
The paper deals with transferential interpretation and its characteristics. Bleger’s ideas on the situational, dramatic and dialectic characteristics of psychoanalysis and E. Pichon-Rivière’s idea of “dialectic spiral” are discussed. The author reflects on the explicit and implicit aspects of transferential interpretation, which assumes the attention that is characteristic of the participation
in the process itself, but also the consideration of different facets, sometimes opposed, in the mind of the analysand, which, occasionally, articulate dialectically in a back-and-forth movement in the interpretive task. Some developments on the place of metaphor in psychoanalysis and in the interpretive process are integrated, revisiting, synthetically, one aspect of
the theory of the field. Finally, based on two clinical situations, the author reflects on variations in form and content of the explicit interpretation of the transference with different patients, situations and processes of analysis.
Downloads
References
Baranger, M., & Baranger, W. (1961). La situación analítica como campo dinámico. Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis, 4(1), 3-54.
Baranger, W. (1979). «Proceso en espiral» y «campo dinámico». Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis, 59(17), 32.
Bernardi, R., & León de Bernardi de, B. (2012). The concepts of vínculo and dialectical spiral: A bridge between intra- and intersubjectivity.
Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 81, 531-564.
Bleger, J. (1969). Teoría y práctica en psicoanálisis. La praxis psicoanalítica. Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis, 11, 287-303.
(1978). Simbiosis y ambigüedad. Estudio psicoanalítico. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Borbely, A. F. (1998). A psychoanalytic concept of metaphor. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 923-936.
Davidson, D. (1978). What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry, 5(1), 31-47.
León de, B. (1993). El sustrato compartido de la interpretación. Imágenes, fectos y palabras en la experiencia analítica. Revista de
Psicoanálisis y Boletín de la API: 38.o Congreso de la API, Amsterdam, 1993, 50(4-5), 809-826.
(2010). La formación psicoanalítica en un contexto de pluralismo teórico y técnico. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicoanálisis, 9,
-138.
León de, B., & Altmann, M. (2014). The three-level model in psychoanalytic training. En M. Altmann (ed.), Time for Change: Tracking
Transformations in Psychoanalysis-The Threelevel Model (pp. 281-294). London: Karnac.
León de Bernardi de, B. (2000). Contratransferencia: una perspectiva desde Latinoamérica. Revista Uruguaya de Psicoanálisis, 92, 71-104.
(2013). Metaphor, Analytic Field, and Spiral Process. En S. M. Katz (ed.), Metaphor and Fields. Common Ground, Common Language,
and the Future of Psychoanalysis (pp. 182-203). New York: Routledge.
(2014). Commentary on: «The Compulsion to Confess and the Compulsion to Judge in the Analytic Situation», by Stefano Fajrajzen.
International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 95, 995-1006.
Etchegoyen, R. H. (1986). Los fundamentos de la técnica psicoanalítica. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metáforas de la vida cotidiana (vol. 2). Madrid: Cátedra.
Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., & Fischmann, M. (2006). What is conceptual research in psychoanalysis? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87,
-1396.
Levenson, E. A. (1974). Changing concepts of intimacy in psychoanalytic practice. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 10, 359-368.
Morin, E. (1977). Le Méthode (vol. 1-5). Paris: Le Seuil. Ogden, T. H. (1992). El sujeto dialécticamente constituido/descentrado del psicoanálisis I. El sujeto Freudiano. Libro Anual de Psicoanálisis, 8, 99-108
Pichon-Rivière, E. (1998). El Proceso Grupal. Del Psicoanálisis a la Psicología Social. Buenos Aires: Nueva visión.
Racker, H. (1977). La neurosis de contratransferencia. En Estudios sobre técnica psicoanalítica (pp. 182-221). Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud: una interpretación de la cultura. México: Siglo xxi.
Stern, D. N., Sander, L. W., Nahum, J. P., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C. et al. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in
psychoanalytic therapy: The «something more» than interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 903-921.
Szpilka, J. I. (1976). Complejo de Edipo y «a posteriori». Revista de Psicoanálisis, 33(2), 285-300.
Wallerstein, R. S. (2013). Metaphor in Psychoanalysis and Clinical Data. En S. Montana Katz (ed.), Metaphor and Fields Common Ground Common Language and the Future of Psychoanalysis (pp. 22-38). New York, London: Routledge.
This work is licensed under a 