Some Reflections on the Use and Meaning of Conflict in Contemporary Psychoanalysis

Authors

  • Jorge Canestri

Keywords:

conflicto, teoría, material clínico, investigación conceptual

Abstract

In this work I present some reflections on the concept of conflict in contemporary psychoanalysis, and more especially in European psychoanalysis within which, however, this concept as such does not seem to arouse particular interest. In fact, I do not recall that it has been the object of any theoretical examinations recently. This does not necessarily mean that the concept has been rejected or substituted; at most, as I shall mention later, some preconflictual stages of development have been hypothesized. The concept of conflict is generally implicit in analytical work and in the subsequent conceptualization, and is used - as happens with many other concepts - with very different and at times diverging meanings, both by the various schools of thought and within the same school itself. These notes will be accompanied by a clinical example that will attempt to illustrate some of the possible choices of the analyst
 at work concerning the use of the concept of conflict.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Jorge Canestri

    Medico psiquiatra. Psicoanalista didacta de la Asociacion Italiana de Psicoanálisis y de la Asociación Psicoanalítica Argentina

References

ABEND, S., 1981, Psychic conflict and the concept of defense. Psychoanal. Q. 50: 67-76.

ABRAMS, S., 1974, A discussion of the paper by J. Sandler on "Psychological conflict and the structural model. Some clinical and theoretical implications". Int. J. Psycho-Anal. 55: 63-66.

BION, W. R.,1965, Transformations. London, W. Heinemann Medical Books Ltd.

BOTELLA, C. & S., 1992, Névrose traumatique et cohérence psychique. Revue française de psychosomatique, 2.

-1996, La tendence convergente de la régression narcissique. Revue française de psychosomatique, 9.

-2001, Figurabilité et régrédience. Revue française de psychanalyse, 55, 5.

BOTELLA, C., 2003, Propositions pour une recherche psychanalytique fondamentale, in : Le travail psychanalytique. ED., André Green, París, P.U.F.

BOYER, L., 1971, Conflict and resolution. A study of human relations and schizophrenia. Psychoanal. Q. 40: 162-164.

BRENNER, C., 1979, The components of psychic conflict and its consequences in mental life. Psychoanal. Q. 48: 177-197.

-1982, The Mind in Conflict, New York, Int. Univ. Press.

BRITTON, R., 1998, Belief and Imagination, London and New York, Routledge.

CANESTRI, J., 2001, La resource de la méthode, in Courants de la psychanalyse contemporaine, numéro hors série, Revue française de psychanalyse.

-2002, Implicit understanding of clinical material beyond theory. In the website of the European Psychoanalytical Federation.

-2002, Mapping private (implicit, pre-conscious) theories in clinical practice. As chair of the Working Party on Theoretical Issues, with W. Bohleber, P. Denis, G. Diatkine and P. Fonagy. In the website of the European Psychoanalytical Federation.

-2003, The logic of psychoanalytical research, in: Pluralism and Unity? Methods of Research in Psychoanalysis, ed. by M. LeuzingerBohleber, A.U. Dreher and J. Canestri. London, International Psychoanalysis Library. Restauro, Riconciliazione, Riparazione. Psicoanalisi, 2:175- 185. Roma, Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore. (Ed.), 2006, Psychoanalysis: from practice to theory, London, Wiley and Sons, Whurr Series in Psychoanalysis.

COOPER, A.M., 1985, A historical review of paradigms, in: Models of the Mind, edited by A. Rothstein, Madison, Connecticut, Int. Univ. Press.

FONAGY, P., 2003, Some complexities in the relationship of psychoanalytic theory to technique. Psychoanal. Q. 72: 13-47.

FREUD, S., 1911, Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning. S.E., 12.

-1924, Neurosis and psychosis, S.E. 19.

-1926, Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety. S.E. 20

GADDINI, E. A Psychoanalytic Theory of Infantile Experience. London, Routledge.

JOSEPH, B., 1989, Psychic Equilibrium and Psychic Change. London, Routledge.

KLEIN, M., 1994, The Writings of Melanie Klein. London, Karnac Books and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.

KRIS, A., 1985, Resistance in convergent and in divergent conflicts. Psychoanal. Q. 54: 537-568.

PAO, P., 1970, Conflict and reconciliation. A study in human relations and schizophrenia. Int. J. Psycho-Anal. 51: 91-92.

PICHON RIVIÈRE, E., 1947, Psicoanálisis de la esquizofrenia. Rev. de Psicoanálisis, 5.

PINE, F., 1994, Some impressions regarding conflict, defect and deficit. Psychoan. Study Child. 49: 222-240.

ROSENFELD, H., 1965, Psychotic States. A Psycho-Analytic Approach. New York, Int. Univ. Press.

-1987, Impasse and Interpretation. London and New York, Tavistock Publications.

SANDLER, J., 1983, Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int. J. of psycho-Anal., 64: 35- 45.

SMITH, H.F., 2003, Conception of conflict in psychoanalytic theory and practice. Psychoanal. Q. 72: 49-96.

STEINER, J., 1993, Psychic Retreats, London and New York, Routledge.

-1996, The aims of psychoanalysis in theory and in practice, Int. J. Psycho-Anal. 77: 1073-1083.

WAELDER, R., 1962, Psychoanalysis, scientific method, and philosophy. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn. 10: 617-637.

Downloads

Published

2009-01-01

How to Cite

Some Reflections on the Use and Meaning of Conflict in Contemporary Psychoanalysis. (2009). Revista Uruguaya De Psicoanálisis, 109, 91-124. http://publicaciones.apuruguay.org/index.php/rup/article/view/1171

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>